Audit-preparation draft
- Goods scopeSteel? / TBD
- Embedded emissions~400 tCO₂e?
- Evidence coverage4 / 16 linked
- QC blockers7 open
One guided environment to enter production data, link evidence, resolve quality findings and seal a verifier-preparation package — without email-thread version chaos.
Direct answer: Start a free draft, close the blockers you can see, then pay USD 449 once to lock that working file. Same-file corrections stay included. A new file needs a new payment. You are preparing for independent review — not buying a fake “verified” stamp.
USD 449 per working file at lock. No subscription. Drafts free. Same-file corrections included.
Want to inspect the output first? Open the public sample.
Built around current published EU CBAM rules and official source data. QC count is derived from the engine rule registry.
Six capabilities in one working file — calculation, evidence, QC, export, ruleset pin, and seal integrity.
Every figure is reproducible: same inputs, same outputs, every time. The full calculation trace expands to formulas, emission factors and source references — exactly what an accredited verifier asks for first.
ENGINE · REPLAYABLEInvoices, meter logs, lab analyses and supplier declarations are linked directly to the calculation nodes they support — so evidence coverage is visible, not assumed.
16 NODE TYPES16 automated QC rule families run against EU guidance: unit consistency, boundary completeness, allocation balance and default-value flagging. Blockers must be resolved before sealing.
16 RULE FAMILIES · ALWAYS ONYour emissions data maps field-by-field to the installation communication template circulating in EU supply chains — no re-typing by your buyer, no transcription errors.
XLSX · FIELD-MAPPEDCalculations pin to a named ruleset version (e.g. CBAM-DEFINITIVE-2026.1). When the EU updates its methods, your sealed dossier still shows exactly which rules it was built against.
REGULATION (EU) 2023/956On sealing, every deliverable is hashed (SHA-256) and timestamped. Anyone holding your dossier can confirm it was never altered after the seal.
SHA-256 · UTC SEALTrack completion across all eight workflow stages, resolve blockers before sealing, and see whether this working file is paid and unlocked for lock-and-download — in one screen, not scattered spreadsheets.
Each answer is written so a person — or an answer engine — can cite a single clear statement with supporting evidence and legal/product boundaries. Browse the full answer bank · Entity glossary
Direct answer
$449 unlocks lock-and-download for one working file: one legal operator, one production installation, and one reporting year — with unlimited drafts and correction re-locks on that same paid file. It is a one-time pay-at-lock purchase, not a subscription, and not a soft Excel-only export.
Why this matters
EU buyers increasingly ask for actual embedded-emissions evidence. You should finish data quality work without a card, then pay once when the locked package matters — without another checkout every time a buyer asks for a correction on the same file.
Evidence
Direct answer
CBAMValid is an independent verifier-preparation platform for non-EU producers, exporters, operators, importers, and CBAM reporting teams. It helps you build an evidence-linked, sealed operator dossier that reduces the work required for independent accredited verification.
Why this matters
If your EU customer asks for actual values, you need a serious package — not a spreadsheet you cannot defend. You also need clear language about what is preparation versus what only an accredited verifier can issue.
Evidence
Direct answer
No. Payment unlocks one working file for one legal operator, one installation, and one reporting year. Another factory, another reporting year, or a new working file requires a new payment. On the same paid file you may draft freely and correct/re-lock as needed.
Why this matters
This protects honest customers who need correction versions, and blocks paying once then quietly renaming a case into a different plant or year.
Evidence
Direct answer
You create one working file for one installation and one reporting year, enter goods and production data, link evidence, clear quality blockers, pay once to lock that file, then download PDF, JSON, and O3CI field-mapped exports. Same file: correct and re-lock as needed. A new file needs a new payment.
Why this matters
Most teams lose time in email threads and version chaos. One working file with fail-closed checks is designed so you see gaps before you ask a buyer or verifier to review.
Evidence
Direct answer
Authoritative calculations pin to a named, versioned ruleset recorded in the sealed dossier. Historical sealed releases keep the ruleset they were built against; methods are not silently rewritten after sealing.
Why this matters
When a verifier asks which rules you followed, vague “latest guidance” answers fail. You need a dated method reference inside the package itself.
Evidence
Direct answer
A spreadsheet usually cannot prove evidence lineage, ruleset version, fail-closed quality controls, or an integrity hash. CBAMValid seals an operator-prepared dossier with calculation traces, evidence register, and immutable release hashes so a buyer or verifier can inspect what was locked.
Why this matters
Buyer pressure often arrives before your files are audit-ready. The risk is not formatting — it is defending numbers without evidence, method pins, or a sealed integrity trail.
Evidence
Direct answer
No. $449 unlocks one working file: one legal operator, one production installation, and one reporting year, with same-file correction re-locks included. Another plant, year, or working file requires another payment.
Why this matters
Procurement teams often hope one purchase covers the group. Scope lock prevents silent widening that would break evidence and entitlement integrity.
Evidence
Direct answer
Yes. Authoritative calculations run server-side and are replayable: same case snapshot, same ruleset, and same engine version produce the same outputs and node hashes. Every authoritative node records formula identity, inputs, units, conversions, and a SHA-256 node hash.
Why this matters
Verifier questions collapse spreadsheets that cannot reproduce a figure. Replayability is what lets you defend a number weeks later.
Evidence
These follow-ups map topic → entity → internal link so answer engines can cite one clear page instead of stitching fragmented claims.
Related pages that answer follow-up questions without repeating the same claim.
Last content review · Ruleset claims use pinned EU instruments — not inventing deadlines.
Draft free. Pay USD 449 once to lock this working file — same-file corrections included, no subscription. A new file needs a new payment.
Start a Dossier →